 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REWRITE edit
The whole article is unreliable, with claims not supported in the sources and errors deriving from copying info from other articles. BP OMowe (talk) 02:38, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah the article is completely biased, and needs a rewrite. I might do it if I have time ==MeepSire (talk) 23:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
I'll have a go at it using the sources from the Swedish article, as large parts of the Swedish defense industry were involved in the development and construction from Leo 2 Imp. BP OMowe (talk) 02:59, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Dubious claim: "Ability to fight an opponent effectively at a distance of 4,000 meters whilst maintaining a maximum combat range of 8,000 meters" edit
Can't find anything about this on the reference that's listed and I don't think I've ever heard of a tank with a "maximum combat range of 8,000 meters". Okay to remove? --Edward Sandstig (talk) 20:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Look at the page of the gun (Rheinmetall 120 mm gun). 8.000 Meters when using Lahat ammonition. Basilicum (talk) 19:29, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- So what? Sweden doesn't use LAHAT.--Fahrenheit666 (talk) 20:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)