Talk:Striated muscle tissue

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 103.235.3.19 in topic Science

Constructive Feedback edit

Hello. I just happened upon this article and thought I could offer some constructive feedback to improve it. Although the structure and language used are appropriate throughout, I believe the link to the sole reference included does not work properly. Additionally, including a few more good references would perhaps lend the article more credibility. Consider making a mention of the sinoatrial node (pacemaker) to explain why cardiac muscle contractions are involuntary. The last statement defining a sarcomere seems redundant, and I figure it would make sense to merge it into the first sentence. It is an important piece of information, of course, but it simply comes across as being misplaced at the end of the article. There is also the possibility that expanding the information on sarcomeres and cardiac muscle properties would be helpful, though because there are already functional links to other articles to cover this it would likely be acceptable to leave it as is. As I stated before, the formatting is good and the article is free of bias, so those qualities are accounted for already. Rrock401 (talk) 03:05, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Supervised Page Improvement edit

Hello, I am improving the page for a class project under the supervision of Dr. Lesly Temesvari (Username: LTEMESV) at Clemson University. Kaitlynhull (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ok, conflicting definitions wandering around. edit

"Striations" in "Striated Muscle" are not medically considered the pronounced bands of fibre seemingly moving along the muscle fibre. Bodybuilders, for example, misuse this term. Striations are usually defined as connective cross banding, laying entirely orthogonal to the direction of the muscle tissue. This image helps explain what that definition describes: https://img.tfd.com/MosbyMD/thumb/striated-muscle.jpg Tgm1024 (talk) 14:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Put two top comments into their own sections. edit

I tried to fix up the talk page a little. There were two orphaned comments left floating without their own section, so I created two subject titles based upon their content. Tgm1024 (talk) 14:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Science edit

Short not on straired muscles 103.235.3.19 (talk) 08:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply