Revision edit

1/ There is a confusion in the reference to the work of Nover et al, because "stress granules" and "heat stress granules" are not the same structures. I think this reference should be removed.

2/ Here, the SG are presented to be mainly composed of chaperone proteins. This is not correct. SG contain translation factors (eIF4E, eIF4G, eIF4A, eIF3, eIF2 for instance), ribosomal subunits and RNA binding proteins with self aggregation domains such as TIA-R, TIA-1 and G3BP.

3/ The link to the "Paul J. Anderson, Brigham and Women's Hospital" is not a publication. Besides, it leads to an empty page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom Nisciant (talkcontribs) 08:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The large table in "Protein composition of stress granules" edit

Is the giant table of any use here? It composes 90% of the length of the article, but gives little to no useful information to anyone but a researcher working on this specific thing, in which case the researcher would find this info in the referenced articles themselves. 85.196.224.45 (talk) 08:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply