Talk:Street children in the Philippines

originality of the text, and NPOV issues

I have checked out some of the sources and so far they are looking like material is cut and pasted from them... and there are some NPOV issues, I will begin to rewrite for the NPOV, and help would be apprecited. Hohohahaha (talk) 17:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Problem with Ref. no. 7

It is given as refernce to many fact statements in the text, but the link doesn't lead anywhere. Other references will have to be added. Thanks Maysara (talk) 20:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Article needs rewrite

Statistics from the late 1990s and many undated statements. Several dead links. I've just deleted one section that was a copyvio (found using the Wayback machine on one of the dead links). I suspect that several others are too: the "problems" section reads like newspaper clippings and the "NGOs" section reads like brochure/advert clippings. This needs shredding and new, up-to-date research. --Stfg (talk) 19:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Street children in the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080202085240/http://ipsnews.net:80/alert/countries/phils1.html to http://ipsnews.net/alert/countries/phils1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090201201423/http://www.sunstar.com.ph:80/static/pam/2007/01/10/news/36.street.kids.rounded.up.html to http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/pam/2007/01/10/news/36.street.kids.rounded.up.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20030504090802/http://www.ips.fi/koulut/199742/6.htm to http://www.ips.fi/koulut/199742/6.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

 Done —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Section filled with seemingly non-notable organizations

The NGO responses section is currently a list of what appears to be mostly non-notable organizations. A number of them are cited with first-party sources. Wikipedia is not a business directory and we should only be mentioning notable organizations that are active in the region (We can't possibly list every business in the world). —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)