Talk:Streatham (UK Parliament constituency)

Avoiding partisan edit wars

I have now undone changes made by LordAshcroft2010to the history section twice. These made claims that the Conservative are now the potential challengers to the incumbent Labour party.

By all means calculate a notional swing required for the Tories to take this seat from third place, but please do so by adding this in the next general election section, without deleting all reference to the party currently in second place, and certainly not by rewriting history.

The percentage change figures in the 2005 result box also look to be incorrect as a result of a much older edit. Could a disinterested psephologist take a look at them, please.

--Lang rabbie 11:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

I have undone a series of changes by Melrose 8765. Simply because the incumbent MP has used Parliamentary privilege to make assertions about one of his opponents "on the record" does not turn these assertions into encyclopaedic facts. --Lang rabbie 00:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Boundary changes

I dont quite believe this, under "History": The 1918 boundaries of the Streatham constituency remained unchanged until changes to Greater London local government in the 1960s were reflected in the constituency boundaries fought at the 1970 election. The February 1974 election seems more likely as when new boundaries became effective. (Changes had been decided in Parliament in 1971. I imagine the Boundary Bommission recommendations were made in 1970, perhaps before the 1970 election.)
Also I see a reference to boundary changes under "Boundaries” but no date given for these changes.
Laurel Bush 10:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC).

I have now altered the article, in line with observations above. Laurel Bush 09:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC).

Accuracy of editing

Can someone check the editing that was done on the 7th Oct 2005. There is an election about to be held in this constituency on 20th October 2005 and I would not like anybody to be misled.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Streatham (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)