Fixed link across elsewhere? edit

Can anyone add more info on the possible plans of contructing a tunnel and/or bridge across to the other side elswhere? I am quite curious as to whether any steps have been taken to decide to build infrastructure links across the:

Anyone with inside knowledge on any of these? I've posted similar requests elsewhere. Gruesome Twosome! 8v] //Big Adamsky 20:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Project stopped edit

My recent update has been reverted. Serves me right for not providing a source, I guess. Here's one, then: "Italy's new transport minister says Messina straits bridge will not be built". Bianchi is reported as saying that the bridge "will not be built. It is the most useless and damaging project in Italy in the last hundred years." This has been reported by other news agencies as well. Rl 09:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

There is the possibility that the project will be stopped. But one (or two in this case, as far as I know) ministers who says that he doesn't like the bridge are not enought to state that it will be stopped.
The cited source doesn't say that there are others in the new government supporting the project. (I think for example Giuliano Amato, when in charge as prime minister started the project). So that's why I reverted it. Actually it's more a problem of improper journalism.. beside that you should always provide a source. --Trifi 09:40, 18 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
The transport minister being one of the persons being sceptical (and I assume the bridge would be in his portfolio) I have included a phrase to alert readers that construction may possibly not start as planned. As long as we do not hear from Prodi himself that the project is going ahead I think we have to include a cautionary statement. --Klaus with K 14:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Trifi, a transport minister has all the power he needs to block this project. If a transport minister's opinion has no weight on such an important project for the transport framework of Italy, I don't know what has. --80.202.223.241 20:23, 1 June 2006 (signiture added by Trifi 07:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC))Reply
It's not that easy, probably it's not under the transport minister's competence but under the infrastructure minister's one. I think the current version states clearly that there is the possibility that the project will not (now) be realised. So that is the most exact description we can give by now. --Trifi 07:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Running water edit

I see an editor questions the statement that many Sicilians lack running water. Come on! It doesn't take long to find out the sad state of the Sicilian aqueducts. You don't have to be in Africa to live in the Third World. Just go for a wander around Washington DC one winter morning and count the homeless living in the snow on park benches, national monuments and bus shelters. --Jumbo 21:54, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

No, I don't think that there is a town in Sicily were you don't have running water. What happens if there is a dry winter/spring is described on the page you linked to. So you may have water shortage in summer time with alternating water supply, but there have been improvements in water supply after the last very dry summer (maybe the one cited on the link you gave). --Trifi 11:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Nevertheless, that is a source for towns without running water. Having water once every twenty days is very Third World, wouldn't you say? And, as I pointed out, just because a nation has high standards of living for some, doesn't mean that all enjoy the same standards. --Jumbo 16:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Grammar - Antiques edit

Someone really should rewrite the whole section - the grammar is just bad to the point of illegible. I tried to rewrite it but gave up after the first three sentences because I do not understand what the original author meant.

84.73.199.167 09:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC) (mike.s@vollbio.de)Reply

The level of incoherence suggests it was translated using some automated means, like a free online translator. It's pretty abominable. 18.173.1.42 17:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Problem with alternative suggestions section edit

This section seems to be machine translated. Somebody please find the original source and do a proper translation. --216.239.55.7 08:52, 14 November 2007 (signiture added by Astronaut 12:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC))Reply

It's on my list of things to do. Astronaut 12:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I fully editied some of the more interesting sections of the Italian article and summarised the rest. Now that Berlusconi has allocated funding to the project, I have also tried to clean up the whole article. - Ipigott (talk) 12:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Berlusconi still wants it built? edit

Aparently the project has been "unscrapped".[1] - Gennarous (talk) 04:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Great Hanshin earthquake edit

What about adding a link to the Great Hanshin earthquake in the "See also" section?
The earthquake measured 6.8 on the Moment magnitude scale (USGS), and Mj7.3 on the revised (7.2 on the old) JMA magnitude scale. and seems like the bridge project is thought to resist only to a 7,1 magnitudo earthquake...
Thanks for the attention anyway.
Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 09:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't see why an earthquake in Japan would need to be referenced in this article. It seems a pretty random choice. It is the history of quakes greater than magnitude 7.1 elsewhere in the world as well as Italy which causes concern amongst the critics of the bridge, especially because the Strait of Messina is a known earthquake zone. It is perhaps worth pointing out that the bridge will also be just 60 km from Europe's most active volcano, Etna.
I removed the references you cited in your comment above. They are unnecessary because that earthquake's magnitude is well referenced in its own article.
Astronaut (talk) 02:32, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The bridge is not part of Line 1 of TEN-T anymore edit

According to a recent video (min 1:27-1:46) released by the Italian newspaper "La Repubblica", the bridge is no longer part of the Line 1 of Trans-European Transport Networks (TEN-T): "Brussels has deleted the bridge changing the European big infrastructures geography. EU commission has redesigned the communication axes substituting the Berlin-Palermo corridor with Helsinki-Valletta, hence practically deleting from its strategic plans the work between Sicily and Calabria."

The 9th of September 2011 Italian Transports Minister Altero Matteoli has sent a letter to EU Commission Vice President Siim Kallas asking for the inclusion of the corridor Berlin-Palermo into the Helsinki-Valletta [from the Italian Infrastructures and Transports official web site]

See also:

Krige (talk) 15:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Me bridge.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Me bridge.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Me bridge.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Strait of Messina Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Strait of Messina Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Strait of Messina Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ponte dei Meloni edit

BBC reports that the new far-right italian government of Giorgia Meloni re-approved the Messina bridge works today. The parliament in Rome has 60 days to vote and sign it into law or refute the plan. 94.21.237.105 (talk) 22:54, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:07, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply