Talk:Story of a Secret State

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination

Orphaned references in Story of a Secret State edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Story of a Secret State's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "NadeauBarlow2003":

  • From Polish Underground State: Jean-Benoît Nadeau; Julie Barlow (2003). Sixty million Frenchmen can't be wrong: why we love France but not the French. Sourcebooks, Inc. p. 89. ISBN 978-1-4022-0045-8. Retrieved 6 March 2011.
  • From Resistance during World War II: Jean-Benoît Nadeau; Julie Barlow (2003). Sixty million Frenchmen can't be wrong: why we love France but not the French. Sourcebooks, Inc. pp. 89–. ISBN 978-1-4022-0045-8. Retrieved 6 March 2011.

Reference named "Wyman":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 06:37, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 07:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC).Reply

  • Piotrus, this is good to go:   . I see no plagiarism; it is long enough and new enough. The overall narrative is well-verified and the sources, specifically the Rzepa article, and there's a wealth of reviews--this is the kind of coverage all important books should have. I'd like to see the covers, of both editions, but that's another matter. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • Drmies, Good point about the covers. Usually, fair use would balk at 2+ covers, but the 1944 cover seems so simple it may be ineligible for copyright. On the other hand, there were several different covers for later editions, and I have no idea which to pick (take a look at google images). I will add the 1944 cover image, but I don't think we can fair use the one of the random covers (and how to pick the one we like?). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
      • Piotrus, what I was wondering is if we can have two covers, given the requirements for fair use of non-free material. Then again, there's tons of articles for albums that have multiple covers... I may have a look later. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 14:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply