Talk:Stonehenge Apocalypse

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Mongoletsi in topic Film Portrayal - removed

Untitled edit

This article contains useful information, but is written in a very unprofessional style and contains unverified statements. Please fix this up-- it's got lots of good content, it just has poor presentation. Noone has this name yet (talk) 02:44, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

There are no unverified statements in this article. Any statement presented as fact will have a reference, however, it will take some time to locate and provide those references. All remaining statements are qualified as 'speculation' or 'alleged'.

Please do not remove references to homoerotic subtext. It is entirely accurate to state that there was a homoerotic relationship between the two characters, as the difference between homoerotic and homosexual is that one is subtextual, the other physical. Evidence of the former can easily be supplied. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.211.29.20 (talk) 03:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

[citation needed] -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

please stop changing the cast names. his name is Jacob Glaser. it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SteerpikeSister (talkcontribs) 13:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Removal of bollocks edit

I've semi-protected this page and removed a tremendous amount of bollocks, even considering the somewhat extreme plot of this film. If anyone wants to suggest improvements, including a reasonable summary of the plot, please make any suggestions below. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've swapped what was there for three very generalist sentences, based on the plot summaries in reviews. Feel free to revert/modify.
Thanks that's much better. This article will be opened up for anon editing in the near future. Meanwhile, suggestions can be made on this page. Please see the policies on WP:NOR and WP:V. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Lol @ ZZuzz and "removal of bollocks" - one of the best and most descriptive comments I have seen. I was looking at this in the early hours after I watched the movie yesterday and decided to look again later today for a copyedit - you have indeed removed a lot of unnecessary text and saved us a lot of work.
Well done Chaosdruid (talk) 17:43, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Info box edit

Seems that people did not notice the infobox edits lol - I have changed them but someone may need to put some info back in

I have also removed the "misha awesomeness" and related vandalism

Chaosdruid (talk) 22:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think it's been inserted since the temporary block has lifted. I have removed some other vandalism too. -- roleplayer 23:15, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Film Portrayal - removed edit

The section was part opinion piece, part plot summary. Whoever went to the effort of writing that section should direct their efforts at improving the Plot section. Mongoletsi (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)Reply