This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
A fact from Stonebergia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 March 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This genus is said to be related to both Chamaebatia and Chamaebatiaria. The first of these has been placed in subfamily Dryadoideae from molecular phylogeny of living plants, and the second in the Sorbaria group within subfamily Amygdaloideae. The subfamily to which this fossil genus belongs is thus unclear. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 22:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
