Talk:Stirling Range
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title?
editShouldnt this art have 'Stirling Range, Western Australia' as the correct title? User:SatuSuro 00:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Toolbrunnup
editToolbrunnup links here, due to an 1834 ref in Descriptive Account of the Panoramic View &c. of King George's Sound and the Adjacent Country. The similar name 'Toolbrunup' is another article on one of the peaks. Needs mentioning, cygnis insignis 20:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Mount Magog
editthis should not be linked as it links to a page about a mountain in columbia so i will remove the link from it Msambell (talk) 02:27, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
climate change reference
editShouldn't all articles be free of political speech? Climate change is a political crusade and absolutely not factual science. Using wiki articles to further Leftist political goals greatly diminishes the credibility of all Wikipedia articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.194.41.89 (talk) 20:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Climate change is based on factual science. It is not a 'political crusade'. Using Wikipedia talk pages to further right-wing goals greatly diminishes the credibility of contributors. Having said that, since the statement regarding climate change in the article is unsourced, it shouldn't be there. I suggest that rather than bickering over unsourced assertions, contributors find sources for the article. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Andy. Thanks for removing the climate change reference. I'm not trying to further right-wing goals as I only wanted to delete other's political philosophy in the page. You may or may not agree, but I felt that climate reference absolutely didn't belong. And I have just a friendly question - do you still believe climate change is a factual science with all the fraudulent data purported by the pushers of climate change? It used to be global warming.. then climate change.. now climate disruption. It sounds very suspicious. And no, I'm not a right-wing fanatic. I just want freedom from big government. Thanks for your interaction, Andy.
Semi-protected edit request on 31 August 2015
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the history section, it is stated that Mathew Flinders saw the Stirlings from the ocean about eight leagues away. What he saw was the Porongurup range, at that distance. The Stirlings are another ten leagues further north.
220.253.156.200 (talk) 07:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Bazj (talk) 14:56, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Stirling Range. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5QE8rvIqH to http://www.birdlife.org
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110706102341/http://www.birdata.com.au/iba.vm to http://www.birdata.com.au/iba.vm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)