Talk:Stewart Grand Prix

Stewart > Jaguar > Red Bull

I've obviously got different views to everyone else on this one.

I don't think it's necessary to trace the history of all of a team's descendants in the article for that team. I think it's entirely adequate to mention who bought the team - part of the charm of an encyclopedia is following those links through to the next stage. In this case there's not a great deal of similarity in the 'personality' or the histories of the three teams. Not only did they have different owners, different sponsors (HSBC excepted), different management and technical teams (several of each in the case of Jag :-)) and different drivers (Herbert excepted, and he didn't last long), but they have had very different levels of success in F1.

I suppose I can live with the brief mention that has been put in again as a point of interest - at least it's not a potted history of Jaguar and Red Bull, unlike the elements I've previously deleted. Am I the only one who feels like this? 4u1e 7 April 2006

Gary Anderson

Why is the name Gary Anderson linking to some American football player and even when you click disambiguation there is no mention of the former car designer.

Fixed it, in a way. --Guroadrunner 04:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

1999 bolded

Why is it that the entry for 1999 is bolded whereas 1998 and 1997 are not? What do we want for the standard style? -- Guroadrunner 04:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Diniz fixed it. Rock on, Diniz. Guroadrunner 11:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Ownership

It says here and on Jackie Stewart's own page that he was the owner of the Stewart Grand Prix team, and this clashes with my memories of the era. The team was unquestionable owned by Paul Stewart who brought it up form the Formula 3000 ranks, but did Jackie actually have an ownership stake in the team? He didn't when it was a Formula 3000 team. My memory recalls that Jackie was a figurehead for the team and facilitator to bringing in Ford's involvement. Can anyone confirm or deny? --Falcadore (talk) 23:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Sentence does not make sense

The following sentence:
The team's first season had not been hugely successful with a sole win for Stewart at Snetterton.
originally read
The team's first season had not been hugely with a sole win for Stewart at Snetterton.
I added an extra word to make sense, but am not sure if it is right. Op47 (talk) 17:52, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Looks like a good change. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 01:23, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Stewart Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050411210440/http://www.npl.co.uk:80/nmp/case_studies/stewart_grand_prix1.html to http://www.npl.co.uk/nmp/case_studies/stewart_grand_prix1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Was there a connection between Stewart and Brabham in Milton Keynes?

Dear wikipedians, a historic question to those who may know: In 1990, both Brabham (Motor Racing Developments) and Paul Stewart Racing moved to Milton Keynes - was there any infrastructural connection between those teams at that time, or did they move independently into totally separate premises? 92.195.9.254 (talk) 23:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)