This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Stevens v Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there,
I am new to this, but on my page it says there is no lead section.
I have put an introduction to the case above the contents - i thought that would be considered a lead section.
Any advice?
Thanks
Those two first paragraphs are a decent lead. It could be improved further, but I removed the warning for that on the page. --anoddname 00:28, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources. Don't use "ibid", "op cit" etc. Wikipedia articles are meant to be edited by multiple parties and to all the insertion of material and footnotes by people who don't necessarily understand systems which were out of fashion when I was at uni in the early 1970s.--Grahame (talk) 06:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I have changed the referencing so that there are no more ibid's. Can anyone advise me on other changes needed? :)
Also, i had a word limit of 2500 words- so this is meant to be a brief summary of the case. Is there anyway to change the title to mention that?