Talk:Steven Moore (author)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Untitled edit
Holy cow! The wikieditors who put the notability/primary source warning on the Moore page are a bunch of idiots. Moore is one of the most prolific and highly regarded critics around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.18.168.142 (talk) 02:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Author here: If I publish something new, what's wrong with adding it? Bibliographical notices are neutral and easily verifiable. Am I supposed to wait around for someone with a Wiki account to notice I've published something new and take the initiative to add it, which may take months or years? Shouldn't Wiki entries be as up-to-date as possible? As long as I'm not adding false info, I don't see what the problem is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smoore3 (talk • contribs) 06:54, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Rewritten article edit
Hi,
My last edit has been flagged as vandalism, but I obviously don't agree. I've rewritten the article by removing a lot of unnecessary information but retaining the main points - Moore's expertise on Gaddis, his work at Dalkey, some praise by big names such as Franzen and Manguel. This hardly can be seen as giving him a bad name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.50.204.18 (talk) 10:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)