Talk:Steve Russell (politician)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
small change re snark edit
Nice one to put in his hobbies "taking 23,500$ for selling out the neutrality of the internet" -- if you want to make the point on political donations, please have a separate section on that. As a non-American and not knowing much on these issues, I think I am clearly NPOV, and removed this phrasing, as it is not to standard, nor is it referenced. Hundnase (talk) 08:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
is the subject of this page editing it frequently? edit
The article at https://www.thelostogle.com/2018/11/01/steve-russell-edits-his-own-wikipedia-page/ suggests with some confidence that user Regular122, who has made many edits to this page, is also the subject of it, in contravention of Wikipedia etiquette. Therefore, should all the edits made by Regular122 be reverted? Lowlyeditor (talk) 18:09, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Re. the "Scandal" section edit
I'm not sure this warrants its whole section.
As of right now, it's not a major controversy (in my opinion), although it is quite annoying.
Maybe this could be included in a paragraph about his 2018 re-election campaign? ProgrammingGeek talktome 00:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Election results in the lead edit
I think it's worth mentioning that the subject lost their re-election bid in the lead, that's an important detail for a politician. I don't think it's quite so important to mention who they lost to, but it also doesn't make the article much longer so it's probably worth mentioning as well. User:Regular122, can you explain why you think it should be removed? The WP:lead is supposed to summarise important details that are in the article. Nil Einne (talk) 13:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)