Talk:Steve Kornacki
Latest comment: 11 days ago by Novem Linguae in topic Todays article
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Steve Kornacki article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RfC: Khakis
edit- The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I'm withdrawing this. It's now apparent that I was overvaluing the significance of those pants he was wearing. feminist (talk) | free Hong Kong 05:21, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Should Kornacki's khaki pants he wore during his election night coverage be mentioned in this article?
Survey
edit- Yes. Kornacki's khaki pants have been reported in reliable sources, such as LA Times (RSP entry) and Entertainment Weekly (RSP entry). His khaki pants helped him land on People magazine's 'Sexiest Men Alive' list in 2020, and Gap Inc. CEO Sonia Syngal attributed Kornacki to increased sales of khakis at the retailer. Clearly, this is widely reported content. feminist (talk) | free Hong Kong 04:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- No. Not everything that is verified should be included in an article. This is the definition of trivia. They have no symbolism, no deeper meaning, they didn't influence the job he did or people's opinion of him. They are just pants he wore when he was on TV. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- No per WP:NOTNEWS. The khakis are about as notable as the necktie he wore during the election coverage. KyleJoantalk 04:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- No per WP:NOTNEWS, WP:TRIVIA, and WP:NOTEVERYTHING. This material is drivel. KidAd talk 05:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
editAn alternative is to add a passing mention of his attire on election night in our mention of the "Sexiest Men Alive" entry. feminist (talk) | free Hong Kong 04:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Todays article
editSteve, your article today for NBC News was great!! thank you!! We cannot give up on President Biden! I'm not going to! If we could just stop the mutiny against our President by those hot shots on the Hill. Traitor Democrats, cease and desist! Leave YOUR job! Sandra from Ohio Sandradee17 (talk) 23:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Sandradee17. This talk page is for discussing changes to the Wikipedia article Steve Kornacki. It is unlikely Steve reads this talk page. Discussion should center around changes to the Wikipedia article Steve Kornacki rather than speaking more generally about opinions on what newspaper articles he is writing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- oh! so sorry...I wasn't aware. Sandradee17 (talk) 23:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- No worries. Happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 02:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- oh! so sorry...I wasn't aware. Sandradee17 (talk) 23:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)