Talk:Sternwheeler Columbian disaster
Latest comment: 13 years ago by D'Ranged 1 in topic Columbian Review (added from feedback site)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback (added from feedback site)
editYour request for feedback at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 May 12 has been replied to. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:25, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Columbian Review (added from feedback site)
edit":*I have to say my biggest concern is the tone of the article. It does not seem to encyclopedic. For example, "A sheet of flame" seems more journalistic. Also, you may want to take another look at the guide for reliable sources. I'm not sure if they are all reliable. Other than that, it looks pretty good. Beautiful categories. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:21, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- As for Canadian editors... I do not know who you could contact (I'm a little far from the True North for the next two years). Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you - I will continue to work on the article and may ask for further review. I appreciate your time and consideration.—D'Ranged 1 talk 13:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)"