Talk:Stephen V of Hungary/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: West Virginian (talk · contribs) 18:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Borsoka, I will be engaging in a thorough and comprehensive review and re-review of this article within the next 48 hours. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime. Thanks! -- West Virginian (talk) 18:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Borsoka, I've completed a thorough and comprehensive review and re-review of your article and find that it definitely exceeds the criteria for good article status. I do, however, have some comments and suggestions that should be addressed prior to its passage to Good Article status. Thank you for all you tremendous work on this article, and others likes it. -- West Virginian (talk) 21:17, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Lede

• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, the lede of this article adequately defines Stephen V of Hungary, establishes Stephen's necessary context, and explains why Stephen is otherwise notable.
• The info box for Stephen V of Hungary is beautifully formatted and its content is sourced within the prose of the text and by the references cited therein.
• The image of Stephen's royal seal has been released into the public domain and is therefore suitable for use here in this template.
• Duke of Styria can be de-linked in the second paragraph since it is the second mention.
• I suggest stating that his father's closest advisors fled to the Kingdom of Bohemia.
• Would it be more appropriate to refer to him as being made "Junior King" versus "King-junior?" This is merely a suggestion of course.
• I would add Margaret Island after Rabbits' Island in parentheses.
• The lede is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no further comments or questions for this section.

Childhood (1239–1245)

• The image of Stephen's father, King Béla IV of Hungary, has been released into the Public Domain and is therefore suitable for inclusion in this section.
• I would wiki-link the first mention of the Mongols.
• This section is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no further comments or questions for this section.

Junior king

• I would actually suggest wiki-linking Christendom too to provide context for the term for some readers.
• The image of the seal of Stephen's wife, Elizabeth the Cuman, has been released into the public domain and is therefore suitable for use in this article.
• For Pettau and other geographical place names with names different from their past, I would suggest phrasing them as such: (present-day Ptuj, Slovenia)
• The image of Baba Vida, the medieval fortress at Vidin in Bulgaria is licensed CC BY 2.0 and is therefore good to go.
• While the spelling of Tzar is not incorrect, I would suggest using "Tsar" as that seems to be more prevalent on Wikipedia. Again, this is just a suggestion and does not have to be incorporated.
• The image of Stephen V being crowned by his father, Béla IV, has been released to the Public Domain and is acceptable for inclusion here.
• I would add Margaret Island after Rabbits' Island in parentheses.
• This section is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no further comments or questions for this section.

Reign (1270–1272)

• The map of the Kingdom of Hungary in the second half of the 13th century has been released into the Public Domain and is therefore acceptable for use here.
• The same goes for the image of the Stephen's funeral crown, which has also been released into the public domain.
• This section is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no further comments or questions for this section.

Family

• The image of Stephen's second daughter, Mary with her husband, Charles II of Naples and their children has also been released into the public domain.
• This section is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no comments or questions for this section.

West Virginian, thank you for your thorough and comprehensive review. I modified the article in accordance with your above suggestions. Borsoka (talk) 02:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Borsoka, it's been a pleasure and a privilege, as always, to review one of your articles. Thank you for your thoughtful and timely response to my suggestions and comments and congratulations on a job well done. I hereby pass this article to Good Article status! -- West Virginian (talk) 14:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)