GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 00:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


Happy to review. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 00:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fairly well-written, only a few comments: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 01:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • In "Documentary",
  • Just curious, I wonder why the inverted commas in the quotes should look different. I think you can use the same template.
  • Place some citations at the end of the first para, it looks unsourced just now.
  • with his best friends "close friends" would sound more proper
  • The documentary is currently in development and will be made into a feature-length film. Don't say "currently", say "as of 2016" (if this documentary is still under development).
  • In "Death and reaction"
  • You can place Chris' comment in a quote template
  • You can simply say "Manford" instead of his full name, now that you have introduced him.
  • On 21 May it was announced that a public vigil Announced by whom?
  • Wikilink BBC
  • In "Music"
  • You can simply say "bucket list", not "Bucket List"

No copyvio detected, images are properly licensed. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 01:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sainsf all queries have been responded to. '''tAD''' (talk) 15:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the response. This can be promoted. Great article! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Burial - questionable statement (section Death and reaction)

edit

The paragraph mentioning his funeral states "He was buried the next day". However the BBC News release used as citation does not explicitly state when his burial took place. I therefore question whether the citation should be regarded as supporting the statement. I would be inclined to rephrase the sentence "He was privately buried later" to fit what the citation says, though "later" is an open-ended term.Cloptonson (talk) 06:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply