Talk:Stephen Rademaker
Latest comment: 11 months ago by CommsKathy in topic Should his political views and accomplishments be noted?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Poorly source, non notable controversy edit
I removed some material that doesn't seem that notable. --Malerooster (talk) 14:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Should his political views and accomplishments be noted? edit
I see the Center for Media and Democracy SOURCEWATCH reports Mr. Rademaker benefited from a controversial deal he negotiated while at the State Department and supported the Iraq weapons of mass destruction theory while at the State Department. Among his many op-eds was one for Federalist Society.
Should his conservative political viewpoint or controversies like these be included? https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stephen_G._Rademaker https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stephen_G._Rademaker CommsKathy (talk) 23:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)