Talk:Stephen II of Hungary/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 3family6 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 00:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    The following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag: [1], [2], [3], [4]
    The following image is tagged as needing a US public domain tag, and lacks author information: [5]
Looking at the information, the illustrations should easily be in US public domain, since they are centuries old. Therefore, I think it would be okay if I went ahead and added the tag. I'll also mark the one picture without author info as "anonymous."--¿3family6 contribs 12:18, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
  1. Overall: Other than these few minor image issues, the article is good to go.--¿3family6 contribs 00:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Issues resolved, article passed--¿3family6 contribs 12:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
  1. Pass/Fail: