Talk:Stephen Babcock (lawyer)

Latest comment: 10 months ago by AttackHelicopter51 in topic Law Firm vs Individual

File:Stephen Babcock.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Stephen Babcock.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality and Existance of Article edit

This article is written from a POV that is not inline with Wikipedia Guidelines. It is written like a resume rather than a encyclopedic article.

- AH (talk) 17:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Law Firm vs Individual edit

The article, likely due to bias on part of editors, confuses the actions of the "Stephen Babcock" Law firm and associated website, and the Stephen Babcock Individual, who is the lawyer and owner of the namesake law firm. This must be addressed.

- AH (talk) 17:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply