Talk:Stephanie Moulton Sarkis
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 November 2006. The result of the discussion was Delete. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
It looks like this article has been deleted before for lack of notoriety, but since then Sarkis has published more books and has become more well known in her field. Anne2608 (talk) 21:41, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Stephanie Moulton Sarkis (need to capitalize name) edit
I'm not sure how I typed the last name in all lower case...can this article be turned into Stephanie Moulton Sarkis? Anne2608 (talk) 21:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, user:brianhe!! Anne2608 (talk) 22:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
I've linked other mentions of Sarkis from other pages on Wikipedia edit
I think I might be doing something wrong...I've linked from Sarkis' mention on New Harbinger, Adult ADHD, and ADHD, but a box says there aren't any links. Anne2608 (talk) 22:12, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Talked to user:brianhe and got it all figured out. Thanks! Anne2608 (talk) 22:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Gaslighting edit
I've added the author's contributions to the subject in Gaslighting. You may care to check the references in that article. That should certainly contribute to factors establishing notability. BecomeFree (talk) 01:59, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Third-party sources edit
At the moment, the article is sourced to the subject's own website, to her own writings, to Psychology Today for whom she writes, and to a book by another author but published by the same publisher as her own books, so none of these are truly third-party sources. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)