Talk:Steinberg v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The past reversions had a section "Did the court get it right?", which with the contents seemed (IMAO) to be inappropraite original research on the legal basis, atleast with that phrasing. Tagged for someone better at formatting to give it a pretty courtcase box, etc. 68.39.174.238 01:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Template original research removed because as it stands the article just recites what is in the published opinion. A Criticism section might be appropriate citing law reviews and other courts who have considered similar issues. Signed: Bejnar 18:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic