This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
It was a great movie if you had any sort of sense of humour at all. It was just fun for fun's sake. It wasn't meant to be deep or meaningful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.6.159.211 (talk) 06:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm not sure the parodies should be tagged as trivia; the very -existence- of the parodies is what drives the film. The atagonist hopes to kill the heroes within the plots of the various television shows appearing; for example he tries to run Roy over in a car in the parody of 'Driving Miss Daisy'. Lots42 (talk) 10:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply