Talk:Statista
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Statista article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability edit
167 pages link to this one, whereas 990 mention it (mostly as source reference) —Jerome Potts (talk) 21:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
It should be noted that Statista is a deeply unreliable source, a casual glance at its research shows obvious, basic, flaws - for example rating the US as the #1 most prepared country for a pandemic. It's just a for-profit seller of market analytics, and has no incentive to be honest or transparent. Any reference relying on it should be considered suspect. [some random who cannot into wikipedia, but dislikes poor sources] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.250.102 (talk) 20:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
BASED IN NEW YORK CITY edit
According to it's website, Statista is registered as a corporation in the WTC Manhattan to the underlaying unity of all life so that the voice of intuition may guide us closer to our common keeper (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Philippines agriculture edit
Can you create a graph about the most abundant crops in the Philippines? Also, gather data about Philippine agriculture and identify the top region with significant contribution to agriculture. Additionally, what are the common agricultural practices in each region?" 120.28.217.175 (talk) 01:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)