SRT commuter lines edit

There's an embryonic article called SRT Lines which seems to be about the planned SRT Red Line (Bangsue-Rangsit). There has to be a better name for that... but what? Jpatokal (talk) 11:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The article's now at SRT Red Lines. We may have to wait for an more substantial development before an official name arises. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Route map edit

Toying with the Route diagram templates, I created this map:

Thai State Railway lines
 
Ubon Ratchathani
 
Northeastern Line to Ubon Ratchathani
 
Kantrarom
 
Sisaket
 
Uthumphon Phisai
 
Samrong Thap
 
Sikhoraphum
 
Mueang Thi
 
Surin
 
Lam Chi
 
Buriram
 
Krasang
 
Chakkarat
 
Tha Chang
 
 
Nong Khai
 
 
Northeastern Line to Nong Khai
 
 
Udon Thani
 
 
Non Sa-at
 
 
Nam Phong
 
 
Khon Kaen
 
 
Ban Phai
 
 
Mueang Phon
 
 
Bua Yai Junction
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mueang Khong
 
 
 
Chaturat
 
 
 
Bamnet Narong
 
 
 
 
 
Thanon Chira Junction
 
 
Northeastern Line
 
 
Nakhon Ratchasima
 
 
Sikhio
 
 
Pak Chong
 
 
 
 
Kaeng Khoi Junction
 
 
 
 
 
Chiang Mai
 
 
 
Northern Line to Chiang Mai
 
 
 
Lamphun
 
 
 
Khun Tan
 
 
 
Nakhon Lampang
 
 
 
Mae Mo
 
 
 
Den Chai
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sawankhalok
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ban Dara Junction
 
 
 
Phitsanulok
 
 
 
Phichit
 
 
 
Tapan Hin
 
 
 
Nakhon Sawan
 
 
 
Ban Taklee
 
 
 
Lopburi
 
 
 
 
 
Ban Phachi Junction
 
 
Bang Sue-Ban Phachi
 
 
Saraburi
 
 
Ayutthaya
 
 
Bang Pa-in
 
 
Rangsit
 
 
Don Mueang
 
 
 
Aranyaprathet
 
 
 
Eastern line to Aranyaprathet
 
 
 
Sa Kaeo
 
 
 
Kabinburi
 
 
 
Prachinburi
 
 
 
 
 
Khlong Sip Kao Junction
 
 
 
Sattahip
 
 
 
Map Ta Phut
 
 
 
 
 
 
Khao Chi Chan Junction
 
 
 
 
Laem Chabang
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Si Racha Junction
 
 
 
Chonburi
 
 
 
 
 
Chachoengsao Junction
 
 
Hua Mak
 
 
Makkasan
 
 
 
 
Bang Sue Junction
 
 
 
Sam Sen
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bangkok (Hua Lamphong)
 
 
Thonburi
 
 
 
Taling Chan Junction
 
Nakhon Pathom
 
Nong Pladuk Junction
 
 
 
 
 
 
Suphanburi
 
 
Kanchanaburi
 
 
Waterfall
 
Southern Line to Sungai Kolok
 
Ratchaburi
 
Phetchaburi
 
Cha-am
 
Hua Hin
 
Prachuap Khiri Khan
 
Chumphon
 
Lang Suan
 
Chaiya
 
Ban Thung Pho Junction
 
 
 
 
Khirirat Nikhom
 
Surat Thani
 
Thung Song Junction
 
 
 
 
Trang
 
 
Kantang
 
Khao Chum Thong Junction
 
 
 
 
Nakhon Si Thammarat
 
Phatthalung
 
Hat Yai Junction
 
 
 
 
Padang Besa
 
 
  Butterworth, Malaysia
 
Yala
 
Tanyongmat
 
Sungai Kolok

It's still largely incomplete, but there's an issue which I think needs to be addressed first: appropriateness of the layout.

The diagram's currently laid out in a somewhat north-south orientation. However, it might be more proper to place Bangkok Station at the top, and follow an actual route diagram layout, listing each destination in descending order. --Paul_012 (talk) 23:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Made it a normal route diagram with Bangkok Station on top. See Template:Thai State Railway RDT. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've replaced this with one I made myself, incorporating parts of the diagram: Template:State Railway of Thailand RDT, however, as I am not an autoconfirmed user I cannot use Twinkle to nominate the redundant template for deletion, can someone else do this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jr8825 (talkcontribs) 14:16, 10 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
That shouldn't be necessary. The layouts are different so they aren't really redundant; both could possibly find different uses. Template:State Railway of Thailand RDT currently has several errors, though. The two branches of the Northeastern Line are switched, the Sawankhalok branch is upside down, there isn't a Cha-Am branch and I think the junction stations should be shown. --Paul_012 (talk) 23:19, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the feedback! I've made the following corrections to the Template:State Railway of Thailand RDT:
The two branches of the Northeastern Line are switched.   Fixed
There isn't a Cha-Am branch.   Fixed
The Sawankhalok branch is upside down.   Fixed
The junction stations should be shown.   Doing...
I'm looking into the junction stations today because it'll probably take quite a bit of effort to fix, I'll hopefully get it done soon. As for the other template, should it be put back in the article, perhaps under a name such as 'State Railway of Thailand main lines' - rather than the current name 'Thai State Railway route map'? Thanks, Jr8825 (talk) 09:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I myself am not familiar with railway articles in general, so I can't really say which diagram layout would be best to illustrate which part of the article. Right now, we do have much more diagram than article text, though, so it would probably be appropriate to expand the text and perhaps split to articles about each line first. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:00, 14 March 2013‎ (UTC)Reply

Redundancy with Rail transport in Thailand edit

As the SRT is the sole operator of rail services in Thailand (apart from Bangkok's rapid transit systems), much of both articles seem redundant with each other.

I think that route information at least should be consolidated in this article, as it would be proper to discuss different systems separately. Rail transport in Thailand should provide an overview of the subject, including cultural and historical aspects. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I strongly support the merging. The overlapping of the two articles is confusing for the reader and unnecessary work for authors. Willi2006 (talk) 12:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

As nothing has happened in regards to this merge proposal in the subsequent years, I've removed the merge tag. I suggest future editors re-propose a merger instead of reverting the closure of the old one. This will allow for any real world changes that may have happened in the meantime. ClaretAsh 04:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on State Railway of Thailand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Merger edit

I believe we should merge financial performance and issues together. They have similar content and it is an issue? Yea or Nay? Lord David, Duke of Glencoe (talk) 01:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Western line? edit

Hi all, would like to check whether the Nam Tok / Suphan Buri line sections (currently grouped under Southern line) are officially listed under the Western line (as per link here)? Some of the articles on the Thai Wikipedia also seem to agree (I don't understand Thai myself; read it through a translation tool). If so then it would require a rewrite to some of the articles. NoNews! 01:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

No; they are officially considered branches of the Southern Line. (Those Thai Wikipedia articles would appear to be in error.) --Paul_012 (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:23, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply