 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure) TBrandley 01:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Starlet (film) → Starlet – There is no other article titled Starlet, and it seems to me this passes WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Film Fan (talk) 23:12, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose – a generic ambiguous term like this should not generally have a PRIMARYTOPIC claim without good justification. Dicklyon (talk) 23:40, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose - and giant WP:TROUT for Film Fan for moving anyway after a CSD G6 declined as controversial by Admin Amatulic. See Wikipedia talk:Requested moves, this is exactly why the db-g6 loopholes need closing. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Huh? Not exactly sure what I did wrong... Film Fan (talk) 00:51, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- I believe In ictu oculi means that you started this move request after your initial move was overturned. I do not agree with In ictu oculi though. After your bold action was reverted, you started proper discussion. You followed best practice to a T, nothing troutslapworthy there. --89.0.200.169 (talk) 23:50, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Huh? Not exactly sure what I did wrong... Film Fan (talk) 00:51, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Strong oppose restore disambiguation page that was here until the nominator moved it away yesterday. -- 70.24.250.26 (talk) 06:42, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. Clearly not a primary topic. Move Starlet (disambiguation) to Starlet instead. JIP | Talk 07:04, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. The clear primary topic is actually the term for an actress rather than an obscure just-released film. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:05, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Well, it's not obscure. I was under the impression that if there was only one article using a certain name, there's no need for brackets, but clearly I misunderstood, so my bad. Film Fan (talk) 22:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose and recommend speedy close. --89.0.200.169 (talk) 23:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. I'd say "[S/s]tarlet" refers first and foremost to "young actress" rather than a particular film. (Second and secondmost would be "youg/small star" as in the heavenly body.) 213.246.91.158 (talk) 08:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.