Talk:Stara Zagora

Untitled

The Bulgarian article on Stara Zagora seems to be in a bit of a mess at the moment, with a template at the top linking to What Wikipedia is not. However, there does appear to be a lot of useful information there. If anyone who sees this is able to translate that would be great. — Trilobite (Talk) 10:17, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Edit warring

User:ARTU, User:Groser, you have recently been involved in an edit war (make sure you've read WP:3RR). Instead, you could use the talk page to settle your argument. Please, give your reasons for adding or omitting the controversial link(s). --Cameltrader 10:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey Groser

Please don't remove link The Gallery contains real pictures from Stara Zagora.

Please see WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a link directory. If you can find GFDL pictures of Stara Zagora, great, add them to the page as a gallery. But don't spam your external link. CRCulver 14:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

I see in this page other links and they also included Photos from Stara Zagora. It is Gallery of Real Stara Zagora and discussion forum. And this is reality, not a fake fotos in other sites.

File:SZ-Collage D.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:SZ-Collage D.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 5 January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Biased wording

In the article I found sentences with jugdments: "Incredibly sadistically..." What does the map combining today's town structure with the ancient structure tell the reader? The text should refer to the picture, otherwise it is just there to look nice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.176.41.175 (talk) 07:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Boruy

I've just moved Battle of Boruy to "Battle of Beroia (1208)", as in Battle of Beroia. But I'm a little bit worried about the word "Boruy" because I can't find it anywhere here on enwiki. Was it a good move? José Luiz ^talk 00:56, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't see any mistake. On the contrary, it brings a bit more consistency. It looks as though the names Boruy, Beroe, and Beroia were used simultaneously during that period. Hence, naming the battles the same way makes it clear that they actually took place near the same city. --Laveol ^T 10:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

The "Boruy" (is it Bulgarian?) should be in somewhere in this article, shouldn't it? José Luiz ^talk 12:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Stara Zagora. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110930162337/http://www.asser.nl/eel-webroot/www/documents/cms_eel_id168_1_OPRD_29August_FINAL_Revised%5B1%5D.pdf to http://www.asser.nl/eel-webroot/www/documents/cms_eel_id168_1_OPRD_29August_FINAL_Revised%5B1%5D.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Possible copyvio

Looking at changes of the article, this change [1] was probably copied from http://old.starazagora.bg/en/obschina-stara-zagora/brief-history which is dated earlier to 2010. Teemeah ^{편지 (letter)} 07:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Stara Zagora massacre

I really want to know who added the section where 48.000 men strong Turkish (or Ottoman) army unit massacred 14.000 Bulgarians. What link and where do you get this information? I know the destruction of the city by Ottomans but the massacre has never been confirmed. Who knows more about this? Ottomans never massacred civilians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.145.207.49 (talk) 12:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Stara Zagora. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706142758/http://www.geography.iit.bas.bg/2009/1-09/13-17.pdf to http://www.geography.iit.bas.bg/2009/1-09/13-17.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070217155340/http://tour.starazagora.net/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1 to http://tour.starazagora.net/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041124055018/http://www.visitbulgaria.com/citydetails.php?id=63 to http://www.visitbulgaria.com/citydetails.php?id=63

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Non-sequitur at "John's Byzantine army"

The section starting with "John's Byzantine army, and many of the captives, were settled as foederati within the Byzantine frontier" seems to refer to some battle that is not described. It has nothing to do with the Gothic War of 377 CE. The first emperor named John did not reign for another 200 years.

I suspect this statement refers to the Battle of Beroia (1208) The confusion is between ancient Beroa in Thrace (modern Stara Zagora, Hungary) and ancient Bero[i]a in Scythia Minor (modern Ostrov Romania) RMcPhillip (talk) 18:59, 10 November 2020 (UTC)