This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I removed the sentence "In 1789 he also purchased the rank of a general of artillery from the Saxon minister, Heinrich von Brühl, for 20,000 ducats. " from the text because there has to be a mistake here. Heinrich v. Brühl died in 1763, so he couldn't have sold anything to Stanislaw Potocki in 1789. So either S.P. bought it from someone else (who ?) or he didn't buy anthing at all. Maybe someone with expert knowledge can fix this. Travelbird 07:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It is quite astonishing, nay shocking, and perhaps a testament to the persistent unreconstructed trend on this encyclopaedia that an article going back to January 2005 has been allowed by all its many contributors to remain utterly and disgracefully free of any mention of the subject's female inheritance or of any presentation of his relations with women, save for a minuscule sentence about one of his many daughters marrying yet another, presumably significant enough (he has a wiki entry), male.
Wikipedians of all orientations, what precisely, fourteen years on, is going on here? What does it tell us?--Po Mieczu (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
