This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The note says the first type number is the wing area but the specs give the area of the RSV.28 as 26. Can someone with Jouhau double check, please? The type 26 does have wings of 26 m2, as expected.TSRL (talk) 09:30, 31 July 2016 (UTC) It says that the 26 differed from the 28 in having a different engine (Lynx) and a smaller wing area.TSRL (talk) 10:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article mentions the Stampe et Vertongen ST.26. This is in the title of this piece but its text talks consistently about the SV.26, so it looks as if the T is a typo. SV makes much more sense after Renard's departure.TSRL (talk) 13:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
