Talk:Stack (magazine)

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Image edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can someone put I image on, I can't - Brainiack16 ([[User:Brainiack16|

Why is this article being deleted? --Brainiack16 (talk) 03:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Removal of dated prod and notability tags edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have just removed the dated prod and notability tags.

Firstly the prod: how can a magazine with a readership of five million be classified as "not very notable"? What criteria are being applied here?

Secondly the notability tag, which asks for reliable secondary sources. The article cites references to both Reuters and GlobeNewswire. Aren't these reliable and secondary? Have I missed something?

I might add that I have no connection with this magazine, no conflict of interest, and since I live in UK I have never even seen a copy. The tags just seemed to me to be inappropriate. Correct me if I'm wrong. Hebrides (talk) 22:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic