Talk:St Peter's Cathedral, Belfast

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

A considerable amount of information has been copy-pasted back into the article. It appears to have been done by someone closely linked to the cathedral (judging by the user names). Because they have provided no proof that permission is allowed for this copyright violation, I have removed the section again.

The list of previous incumbments is also a direct copy of the information on the cathedral website. Technically this is a copyright violation too, but I've left the list in the article and cited its source. Sionk (talk) 13:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

NB the information that has been removed was a copy in its entirety of [1] and [2]. The history section has been (slightly) reworded in the first paragraph only, the remainder was a direct copy of [3]. I've retained the first paragraph only. I was tempted to ask for some independent reliable sources but, because the article is now relatively short, this request would be overkill! There seems to be nothing in the article taken from the cited bibliography - maybe if someone has access to this book they can add some variety. Sionk (talk) 14:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Official site link broken.

The link to the official website is broken. Replacement site not found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.196.12.210 (talk) 05:36, 30 March 2018 (UTC)