Talk:St Pabo's Church, Llanbabo

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review
Good articleSt Pabo's Church, Llanbabo has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 11, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 12, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that although the Welsh church of St Pabo, Llanbabo has a 14th-century monument to Pabo Post Prydain, its supposed 5th-century founder, there is no good evidence that he founded the church?

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:St Pabo's Church, Llanbabo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: Fixed one dab.[1] –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Linkrot: No dead links, fixed one access date. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria edit

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    A made a few minor copyedits.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    All good and reliable
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Correctly licensed and tagged
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    I have no problems in assessing this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:45, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply