Talk:St Nicholas Church, Brighton

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Hassocks5489 in topic Font date
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on St Nicholas' Church, Brighton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on St Nicholas' Church, Brighton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Font date

edit

This nonsense appears in the article

In its current form, St. Nicholas church dates from the mid-14th century. A font from that period is preserved within the church. It was carved in around 1170...

A font from the mid-14th century was carved around 1170? Please can someone correct this. They could also address the matter of why the date of construction is repeated at the start of the next paragraph. It seems be a case of people just dumping information in the article with bothering to think about how it fits into the overall sense. John Price (talk) 09:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Looking back at the article history, I can see that some text has been removed (without explanation) which alters the context of the sentences. I will fix in a bit when I dig my book sources out. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 19:12, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply