Talk:St Dona's Church, Llanddona

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Dr. Blofeld in topic GA Review
Good articleSt Dona's Church, Llanddona has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 2, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 24, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that St Dona's Church, Llanddona, Wales, was rebuilt in 1873 with the rector at the time acting as the architect?

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:St Dona's Church, Llanddona/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:Dr. Blofeld 11:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

This is an exemplary GA quality article which meets all of the GA criteria, short, but very well focused and written, the way an encyclopedia article should be. I would, however, like to see an image of inside the church or churchyard when it becomes available. It's not ready for FA yet, and I doubt it ever could be unless far more detail was found on it local library archives which provide valuable information on its history in earlier times or coverage in more books but you've used some ideal books and sources to help you write this which is more than enough for GA. Good job, I'm promoting this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply