Talk:St Botolph's Church, Quarrington/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 15:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Lede

• "hexagons and trefoils into the reticulated" -links here would be useful

I've linked trefoil, and provided a wiktionary link for reticulated. —Noswall59 (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC).

Construction

• "to an earlier, now-lost nave." -nave should be linked earlier in first instance and delinked here

Done. —Noswall59 (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC).

Architecture

• "Its windows are by H. Hughes and Burlison and Grylls, while another commemorates the Barrett family. Morris and Co. worked on a window in the north aisle.[17]" -do we know when they were installed?

I've added dates for the Hughes, Barrett family and Morris ones; dates for the others are missing, but have been dated in the source to 19th/20th century (vague I know).

• Some more photographs, particularly interior would be good.

They would, but disappointingly I cannot find any, and I don't live in the area to take any of my own. —Noswall59 (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC).

Ping me when you've addressed, I made the other small changes myself.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: I have replied to your comments above and altered the article as per these edits. Let me know if anything more is needed. Thank you very much for taking this on—it's greatly appreciated. —Noswall59 (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC).

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Looks good for GA, sorry you had to wait so long!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much! —Noswall59 (talk) 12:31, 4 January 2016 (UTC).