Talk:St. Clair Streett/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Binksternet in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk) 05:12, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
I think we could use a little more detail in the lead, not necessarily two paragraphs but at least a few more lines to cover what is expanded in the main body, say a snippet on his early life and/or WWI, and a bit more on those historic flights.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Be nice to finish the last para of Heavy bombers and the first para of Postwar career with citations.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
In Alaska, what are "model airways" - can it be clarified briefly in the text for the uninitiated?- Best spell out state names like Fla. for the non-Americans... ;-)
- Nothing specific to say about what he did in the Pacific with Thirteenth Air Force?
Nothing to say about his retirement and death?
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
In the infobox photo, could we pls be explicit about which is Street (I don't know just looking at it)...- Alt text would be helpful for the images.
- Second photo still needs alt text.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Okay, I see your comments but I will not be online enough to fix them until about December 28. I'm very interested in making the article as good as it can be, so thanks in advance for a few days of leeway. Binksternet (talk) 00:58, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- Heh, take your time, 'tis Christmas... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- Still there? I'm about to dig in. Binksternet (talk) 04:50, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Heh, take your time, 'tis Christmas... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I see your comments but I will not be online enough to fix them until about December 28. I'm very interested in making the article as good as it can be, so thanks in advance for a few days of leeway. Binksternet (talk) 00:58, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
<=I've been expanding the article, as GA-related research showed me that there was much missing, that it needed quite a bit more fleshing out. Along the way, I have addressed some of your concerns. Soon, I will expand the lead to reflect article contents. Binksternet (talk) 01:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- No hurry, I've been on vacation a few days anyway... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your patience! I have built up the lead to match the article's new additions, and I think the whole thing is ready for your inspection. Binksternet (talk) 09:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- In answer to your note about "model airways": I do not have a good grasp of what was meant by that phrase, so I took it out. Historical mentions of "model airways" that I found online were not specific enough to define the term. Binksternet (talk) 09:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nice expansion, pretty well there if you could just take care of the latest minor points. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, your points have been addressed. Binksternet (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Tks mate - passed, and well done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you! :)
- Binksternet (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Tks mate - passed, and well done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, your points have been addressed. Binksternet (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nice expansion, pretty well there if you could just take care of the latest minor points. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- In answer to your note about "model airways": I do not have a good grasp of what was meant by that phrase, so I took it out. Historical mentions of "model airways" that I found online were not specific enough to define the term. Binksternet (talk) 09:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your patience! I have built up the lead to match the article's new additions, and I think the whole thing is ready for your inspection. Binksternet (talk) 09:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)