This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
What's the relevance of the author here? We can find better references right? My Lord (talk) 14:09, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thats not a good objection to a critique from such a prominent historian. So the question that you ought to ask is "why can't we have his critique of Raghavan here?" Its certainly more worthy, judging by the number of cites on Google Scholar, than most of the others who have been cited on the article. Whats the motive behind removing the scholarly criticism? That is against WP:NPOV. It may even be a BLP violation.DarSahab (talk) 15:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
First off, let me say that I mixed up this Perry Anderson with somebody else. I think my objection was suitably answered by Obaid Raza.
However, now that I look at the book and the so-called critique of Raghavan there, I continue to have concerns. Let me do a bit more reading and get back here with more comments. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
