Talk:Srimanthudu/GA1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Pavanjandhyala in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


I'll finish this one shortly JAGUAR  14:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Initial comments

edit
  • "and played the film's protagonist" - I feel that the protagonist's name should be mentioned here
  • "and encouraged the adoption of village in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh" - should this either be a village or villages?
  • "Harsha Vardhan is the sole heir of his father Ravikanth's business empire worth 250 billion" - no rupee symbol here?
  • "A possible delay was expected as Mahesh had earlier agreed to work in a film" - on a film
  • "All lyrics written by Ramajogayya Sastry, except where noted." - this sentence is unsourced
  • " called a feat that India's then prime minister Narendra Modi‍‍ '​‍s" - isn't he the current prime minister?

Close - promoted

edit

I couldn't find anything worthy of putting this on hold, so I can conclude that this article outright meets the GA criteria. Well done! I think this is your best one yet. It is comprehensive, well written and the references are also fine. I enjoyed reading this one   JAGUAR  15:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review Jaguar! I've resolved all those comments you have listed.   Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply