Talk:Spyridon Marinatos

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Cplakidas in topic GA Review

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 21:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by UndercoverClassicist (talk). Self-nominated at 21:04, 21 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Spyridon Marinatos; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  •   Very extensive, thorough and well referenced article. AGF on offline sources, but having reviewed the author's work in the past I have no concerns. Hooks are interesting and referenced. QPQ done. Good to go. Constantine 10:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Spyridon Marinatos/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cplakidas (talk · contribs) 21:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Will take this on in the following days. Constantine 21:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (inline citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
Lede
Early career and education
First directorate, professorship and Messenia
Politics
Assessment and legacy

That's it for a first pass. The article is the usual thorough work, an interesting and well-written read that captures the life and work of its subject very well. Constantine 10:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks as ever, Constantine -- all looks very sensible. Will get through over the next couple of days. UndercoverClassicist T·C 11:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Mostly sorted now: just a few where I need to find citations. UndercoverClassicist T·C 17:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Cplakidas: All done now, I think. One semi-done on Kordatos and Metaxas: a hand here would be appreciated. UndercoverClassicist T·C 20:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I had another read-through, my comments have been addressed, and I cannot find anything more to nit-pick about. As stated, an excellent piece of work, well above the usual GA standard. I will pass it now. Constantine 17:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.