Many of these questions arise frequently on the talk page concerning Spygate.

To view an explanation to the answer, click the [show] link to the right of the question.

Q1: What is the specific topic area for this article?
A1: The term "Spygate" originates in tweets made by Trump in May-June 2018, which were specifically referring to the actions of Stefan Halper, who contacted three Trump campaign members. Later uses to refer to other things are off-topic. There are articles here about those other things. This is not Wikipedia's judgment, it is the consensus view of reliable independent sources, so we reflect those.
Q2: Does the use of the words "spy" and "spying" by Trump and his allies always refer to Spygate? (No.)
A2: No. Not all alleged "spying" on the campaign refers to Spygate, and "spygate" does not refer to all instances of alleged spying on the Trump campaign. It only refers to Halper's actions. There are attempts by certain individuals to muddy the waters by throwing the terms around, but they are found on unreliable sources, and we do not use such sources here.

There are several circumstances and articles (bolded) here to which accusations of "spying" on the Trump campaign may refer:

Q3: If I find instances of the use of the terms "spy" and "spying" used to refer to those other subjects and articles, should they be added here or there?
A3: There, not here. Stay on-topic. If it doesn't involve Halper's actions, it likely doesn't belong here.
Q4: Is the article with its negative material biased? (No.)
A4: No. The article with its negative material is not biased. While the article must include both positive and negative views according to the policies of Wikipedia, the balance must accurately reflect the balance in those sources according to their reliability. According to neutral point of view, we must reflect the subject as it is seen by reliable independent sources, but we must do so accurately and in a neutral way.
Q5: Is the negative material in the article NPOV? (Yes.)
A5: Yes. Including negative material is part of achieving a neutral article. A neutral point of view does not necessarily equate to a sympathetic point of view. Neutrality is achieved by including all points of view found in RS – both positive and negative – in rough proportion to their prominence.