Talk:Sprouse-Reitz
Latest comment: 13 years ago by EncMstr in topic Article rename from Sprouse-Reitz to Sprouse!
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sprouse-Reitz article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Article rename from Sprouse-Reitz to Sprouse!
editPer the article naming conventions, I don't think this should have been renamed Sprouse!. It is known by generations of people as Sprouse-Reitz. The fact that it was renamed shortly before ceasing existence has little to no effect on the Wikipedia name. — EncMstr (talk) 00:59, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- I changed it back, but I did put a mention of the company's 1991 name change. — Caldorwards4 (talk) 01:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! That looks great. — EncMstr (talk) 01:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)