Talk:Spray-on condom

Latest comment: 14 years ago by DragonflySixtyseven in topic Advantage

Question edit

Sorry in advance for the gross anatomical talk. But this is something the article left me wondering about, and I'm sure other people will wonder as well, so it should probably be addressed if you have any sources for it.

My question is (sorry), how do you ejaculate in this? Where does the semen go? Normal condoms have a reservoir. Honestly, it hurts just looking at this thing. Do any of the sources you've read address this? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 01:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

According to the institure website [ here (in German) and a crappy auto-translation;
"In our current prototype can spray the condom does not generate reservoir. However, we develop a procedure that it might be possible in a reservoir to generate Sprühvorgang?. In this reservoir would be the sperm flow."
I therefore think that this invention is more of a 'prototype' than the article might suggest; I will attempt to rectify this balance with sources.  Chzz  ►  08:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Just an addition to the translation: via wikt:sprühen (to spray) and wikt:vorgang (process), I would guess it might be something close to: "In our current prototype the spray does not generate reservoir for the condom. However, we are developing a procedure that might make it possible to generate a reservoir in the spraying process. The sperm would flow into this reservoir."

Advantage edit

Surely the advantages include not just usefulness for unusual sizes, but unusual shapes as well.--Filll (talk | wpc) 02:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Unusual shapes"... like.... helical? DS (talk) 19:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply