A fact from Spoonbridge and Cherry appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Per WP:DYKN#How to review a nomination, reviews are supposed to specify the criteria reviewed and how the article and hook compared against the requirements. I realize it's been a while since you reviewed at DYK, Bamse, but review of this nature, and unsigned at that, is far from adequate. A new, full review is needed. If another reviewer would like to step in, they are welcome to do so, as Bamse has not edited on Wikipedia in nearly three weeks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Trying again. Sorry, but indeed it has been a while since my last review. Hope this procedure could be simplified or made less error prone for occasional editors like me. bamse (talk) 08:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Per WP:DYKN#How to review a nomination, reviews are supposed to specify the criteria reviewed and how the article and hook compared against the requirements. I realize it's been a while since you reviewed at DYK, Bamse, but review of this nature, and unsigned at that, is far from adequate. A new, full review is needed. If another reviewer would like to step in, they are welcome to do so, as Bamse has not edited on Wikipedia in nearly three weeks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
bamse (talk) 08:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)