Talk:Sponge diving

Scuba diving Mid‑importance

	Underwater diving portal This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Scuba divingWikipedia:WikiProject Scuba divingTemplate:WikiProject Scuba divingSCUBA articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Marine life Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Marine life, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on marine life. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life To do:

Have a look at the Marine life WikiProject and sign up.

Here are some tasks you can do, as organized by The Marine life Wikiproject:

Collaboration of the week: Marine life article assessment
Other: See the projects page
Images: Upload any non-copyrighted marine life images to Wikimedia Commons
Featured Articles/Good Articles:
Other: Add {{Portal|Marine life}} to related articles

Suspected copyvio edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

There is a very close paraphrase of the copyrighted text of:

Sandra Hendrikse and André Merks (12 May 2009). "Diving the Skafandro suit". Diving Heritage. Retrieved 2009-10-16.

in these sections:

Background: It is unknown when exactly the sponge became an article of use. In Ancient Greek writings, Plato and Homerus mentioned the sponge as an object used for bathing.
History: The crew went out into the Mediterranean Sea in a small boat. They used a cylindrical object with a glass bottom to search the ocean floor for sponges. As soon as one was found, a diver went overboard to get it. Free diving, he was usually naked and carried a 15 kilogram skandalopetra with him to take him down to the bottom quickly. The diver then cut the sponge loose from the bottom and put a special net around it. Depth and bottom time depended on the divers lung capacity. They usually went down to about about 30 m (98 feet) for 3 to 5 minutes.

Unless anyone feels that the text has been changed sufficiently, I'm inclined to remove those sentences soon. Any dissenting views? --RexxS (talk) 19:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

As a freediver I'm also suspicious of the unsupported claim on that website – widely repeated – that the divers regularly stayed down for 3 to 5 minutes. I suspect that they usually stayed down for 2 to 3 minutes. 5 minutes is only really possible on a 'static' freedive when the diver is doing absolutely no physical activity. Modern record-breaking depths are usually achieved in dives of around 4 minutes – and these are truly exceptional. So I wouldn't repeat the material on factual grounds.

The truth is that when someone who doesn't freedive sees someone else dive, either from a boat or on film, it seems as if they're down for ages; but a stopwatch (or the timings of a Youtube video) will reveal that such dives rarely exceed 2 minutes. --Wally Tharg (talk) 10:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

I tend to agree with Wally Tharg. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 22:10, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic