Talk:Spider Girls

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Dharmadhyaksha in topic Image

I'll be back edit

...to expand it using these refs and others. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Article title edit

"Spider Girls" gets far greater hits than their real names, is their COMMONNAME, and like Jay-Z, is their stage name, and so should be the title of article. I know the convention for such articles is to use their real names, so please discuss it here first if you object. Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:01, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Image edit

Its slightly difficult to understand these sisters without their image. Although as per WP:NFCC living people's free images should be used in the article, we could easily justify non-free image here for the obvious reasons. Anna Frodesiak, could you upload one good image that you might have come across so far that would help understand in a better way? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'm looking but can't find an image with the photo owner identified. What do you think? Here's a site with good pics though: http://kobieceforum.net/4877.htm
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Last one looks good. It actually shows how they not joined at the pelvis (as against to what is written in the article) but somewhere from chest-downwards. Thats how they share a common stomach. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:29, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
But what about the source? We don't know who the owner is. Don't we need to know that? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
I suppose this is okay. There might come a day when this image is nominated for deletion for some minute missing thing by some bot. Lets not worry about that from now. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Gossipy section edit

Removed in this edit, I think the content is valuable, but the way it's written is gossipy. I'd really like to restore it, but written more encyclopedically. What do you think? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I don't think favorite food, actors, hobbies, etc. can be written encyclopedically. But you can try. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:29, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hmmmm, I don't know either, but I will try. Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply