Talk:Sphaleron
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
unobservably rare?
editA strange choice of words.
Doesn't this play into proton decay and don't the known limits on proton instability place a firm limit on this?
Hcobb (talk) 03:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Ungrammatical sentence, doesn't make sense.
editA baryon net excess can be created during the electroweak symmetry breaking can be later preserved only if this phase transition was first-order.
This sentence (Second bullet in main content) is ungrammatical and confusing. I don't know enough about physics to correct it, but one of the can be phrases has to be wrong - or there are two thoughts jammed together. Perhaps just delete the first can be?
Trelligan (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Clumsy me - overwrote the first entry above. My apologies
- let me se: "A baryon net excess that is created during the electroweak-symmetry-breaking can be later preserved only if this phase transition was first-order. Look good?Sinsearach (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sphaleron/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Given the connection to baryogenesis, shouldn't this at least be rated as important as Instanton? |
Last edited at 08:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
IMPOSSIBLE to represent by a feynman diagram? NO WAY
editThere can be no way this is impossible, for instance in a 3D or even 4th-D(video) feynman diagram.Sinsearach (talk) 13:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)