Talk:Spelter

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 84.67.116.161 in topic Picture is pretty useless

2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message edit

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 08:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Status edit

Possibly this article should become a redirect to zinc, but that leaves the problem of the places called Spelter (at present only red links). I do not know how to deal with this. On the other hand, if zinc has been used for sculpture there should be an articel on it. Peterkingiron 14:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Picture is pretty useless edit

This picture is pretty useless for an article on Spelter. If there is any spelter at all in the picture it's by coincidence. It's just one of millions of British fields, with some slag in it. It's not enlightening, educative, informative or even fun! A picture of a spelter works would be very interesting WHILE IT ACTUALLY EXISTED!!! A pic of a site where there used to be something relevant..? Is this a joke?

I hope the guy didn't make an expedition out just to photo this site, and was walking his dog. Just take a look, see what you think. Is it what you'd imagine in an article like this? It's like an article on cotton with a cornfield in it, cos they used to grow cotton in that field 80 years ago.

84.67.116.161 (talk) 23:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply