Talk:Space Shuttle orbiter

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Space Shuttle orbiter article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Spaceflight: Space stations C‑class High‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the space stations working group.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Rocketry High‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"NASA/Rockwell Shuttle" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect NASA/Rockwell Shuttle. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 19#NASA/Rockwell Shuttle until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 12:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Height incorrectly stated as Width (in Infobox) edit

The height of the orbiter (17.86 m) is incorrectly shown as its width. I tried editing to change 'Width' to 'Height', but the entry just disappears when I preview. Can somebody with more experience (and an account) check and fix that please?

Did you know nomination edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Szmenderowiecki (talk) 02:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that one of NASA's Space Shuttle orbiters has more than 2.5 million moving parts? Source: https://phys.org/news/2011-07-shuttle-complex-machine-built.html
- Reviewed:

Created by InvadingInvader (talk). Self-nominated at 02:10, 26 July 2022 (UTC).Reply

Unfortunately, while the hook is interesting to a broad audience, the article does not qualify for DYK. The article has not been created, expanded five-fold, or improved to good article status within the last seven days. As this appears to be your first DYK nomination, I suggest you read WP:DYK and understand the guidelines so that your future nominations will be more successful. If you need any help, the DYKchecker tool is very useful in determining if an article is eligible or not. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Replica Orbiters edit

Latest comment: 11 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There is also a full size replica of the left half of Endeavour at the Cosmosphere in Hutchinson, Kansas. I think it would be worth adding it to the list of replicas.

Here is an article from the Cosmosphere that mentions this: https://cosmo.org/blog/view/the-final-launch-of-the-space-shuttle-endeavour Rmcmullin (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

There's surprisingly another missing replica. It goes by the name Ambassador and was at the KSC until the late 90s when it became a traveling exhibit. No clue what happened to it afterwards, but there are some photos still around.

Alamy Stock Photo of Ambassador

https://www.flickr.com/photos/bobbex/41365012161

https://www.flickr.com/photos/amx566/49219369447 TsarDudebroII (talk) 01:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic