Talk:Soyuz-2-1v

Name: Soyuz-2.1v?

Shouldn't the article be named "Soyuz-2.1v" instead of "Soyuz-2-1v"? That's the spelling I'm seeing on all the Russian references. --IanOsgood (talk) 14:44, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

The two designations are used interchangeably for the other Soyuz-2 configurations. The manufacturer uses a hyphen so I'd tend to go with that. --W. D. Graham 15:49, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

2nd Flight

Will there be a second flight? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.229.245.179 (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Combine articles?

Should this article be combined with the rest of the Soyuz 2.1a/b/ST article? It’s still in that family, sharing launch facilities, tooling and design features. Is there a compelling reason to keep it separate? Blastr42 (talk) 01:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

No, this rocket is too different. It's a repurposed Soyuz center core, with a different engine and structural reinforcements. Our article calls it a "heavily modified derivative". Naming is alas misleading; wish they had kept the "Soyuz-1" development name. — JFG ^talk 01:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 18 October 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

---

Soyuz-2-1v → Soyuz-2.1v – The article text uses a decimal between the numbers, as does the corresponding page on ru.wiki. Hellbus (talk) 23:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – Ammarpad (talk) 06:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• @Hellbus: Discussion needed as most sources in article seem to use "Soyuz-2-1v" and article text seemed to have been mass changed in a series of edits by User:Michael60634 (see revision here) on 6 June 2020. Happily888 (talk) 01:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

  @Happily888:Russian-language sources cited in the article use a dot, not a dash. Other Soyuz models (e.g. Soyuz-2.1a and -2.1b) use a dot as well. Hellbus (talk) 02:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

  @Hellbus: The citing in the article might use a dot, but many of the references were changed from dashes to dots in this edit by User:CRS-20 in August 2020.

  Clicking on the references show that the majority of them do use "Soyuz-2-1v", see: [1], [2] or [3] as examples. Also, the manufacturer's website uses the dash form, see source: [4]. Happily888 (talk) 04:32, 18 October 2022 (UTC); edited 04:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.